The road ahead for Revere Speech and Debate

March 7, 2016

Rather than give a speech at last night’s banquet where students and their parents are really anxious to get their awards, it’s better to just jot down a few thoughts about where we are going in speech and debate and share them with you on my blog.

This method comes with a request, especially to our speech/debate parents – with your involvement, Revere Speech & Debate has become a strong and thriving program.  But we can’t count on just a couple of parents, and we can’t count on just a couple of student leaders, to carry the ball. We can have a 35 to 45 student program in 2016-2017, but only if we have the parent support and student leadership to make it work.

A. PARENTS – The more you can do to boost what we are doing, the more time Coach Hayley and I (and other coaches whom we may add) will have to do what we most want to do – COACH. We will be going to a new practice system next year – working 1-2 nights a week for 1.5 to 2 hours beginning at 6 p.m. at the high school.  (Why?  It is more productive for the students that way.)

  1. We need judges. On average, we have to bring a judge for every 3.5 students we take to a speech and debate tournament.  We should plan for a minimum of 8-9 judges for each/every tournament next year, based upon trends.
  2. We need a regularly-meeting booster group. We could solicit businesses for support.  We could obtain judges from law firms and service organizations in Bath and Richfield. We could do so much more if 7-9 parents got together regularly, put their collective minds to work, and made more happen for speech and debate.

B.  PARENTS AND STUDENTS – It is also time for a few major improvements in our program next year:

  1. Let’s go National! There are tournaments in places such as Princeton and Yale.  We have some terrific debaters and speakers, and they would benefit a lot by competing against the very best in the nation.  Our students will see (and be seen) as the top-flight academic achievers that they are. We can, and should, grow by doing two national tournaments in the coming year, and aiming for more beyond that.
  2. Let’s look at Policy Debate – It’s a bit different. A big advantage in policy is that there is just one topic for an entire year. Perhaps we take a group of incoming ninth graders, assign them to policy, and grow the program using them (and their parents as judges) to begin this process.
  3. Let’s plan for how our students approach and prioritize speech/debate – We know that speech/debate is not the No. 1 extra-curricular for every competitor. So, a couple of student leaders and I are giving a lot of thought to having both “regular” and “reserve” squads for speech/debate next year. If a student has other priorities and only wants to compete for 4-5-6 tournaments, we can put them onto the “reserve” squad. Those who aim to compete in eight or more tournaments next year and who tell us that speech/debate is a high priority will end up on the “regular” squad.

C.  STUDENTS – Let’s look at doing a few more things as well:

  1. Raising our profile –– How to we make fellow students more aware of speech/debate and its many benefits?  How do we make sure your fellow students who would make great speakers and debaters get to our program?  Let Anthony or Megan or Leah or Grace know your thoughts about this.  Some of it is simple – put the words “speech and debate” on a letter jacket, for example.
  2. Pushing each other – We need to improve through preparation and practice. P-P-P-P-P-P.  The more time you put into it the better you will become. We could take 15 students to next year’s State Finals, if you’re willing to put in the effort to get there.
  3. Family – Let’s look a bit beyond the everyday irritations and stresses of high school. We all know the anchors that can drag us down. Let’s keep doing what we have done pretty well this year, regard each other as not just classmates, not just teammates, but as valued and cherished members of a family, a Revere Speech and Debate family. With help from student leadership, we can do this.

*    *     *     *     *

There are three additional “IOI” — Items of Interest, I wish to share with you.

One SURE WAY to improve in speech and debate is attend a summer camp.  One hundred percent of this year’s Revere State Qualifiers went to a camp last summer!  Here’s a link to some of the many camps, including ONLINE CAMPS (you don’t have to leave home for these) offered by the National Speech and Debate Association, NSDA:

summer camps

March 15 is WORLD SPEECH DAY.  There are a lot of activities aimed at heightening the value and importance of speech and debate on this date.  Take Action by clicking here to obtain more details:

world speech day

Finally, here is a link to a terrific contest where you can win acclaim (and admission to a camp) by producing a video about the value of Free Speech.  You can also see the ’16 – ’17 NSDA Policy Debate Topic by clicking here:

free speech and policy topic

MEDIA MEMO 2 — Why aren’t we “getting it” about Donald Trump’s primary successes?

March 2, 2016

trump reagan
Screenwriter Paddy Chayefsky foreshadowed the 2016 Presidential election 40 years ago when writing the script for the movie “Network.” In the film, deranged anchorman Howard Beale gains great popularity by screaming, “I’m mad as well, and I’m not going to take it anymore” to the TV cameras.

Change the “I’m” to “we’re,” and you have a 12-word summation of the Donald Trump campaign.

By any assessment, America’s middle class is shrinking and in worse shape in 2016 than it was in 2012, 2008, or 2004 or even in 2000. One powerful question which propelled Ronald Reagan to the White House was this: “Are you better off now than you were four years ago?”  It helped him win in 1980, and then the Reagan Revolution led to a 49-state landslide for the Great Communicator in 1984.

The answer from Trump supporters and opponents alike to Reagan’s 1980 question is a resounding NO. According to the Pew Research Center on social and demographic trends, the share of national income for the middle class fell from 62 percent in 1970 to 43 percent today.

Rasmussen Reports regularly asks this poll question:  Is America headed on the right track or the wrong track?  In the most recent poll, only 30% of respondents said it is on the right track.  Over the past four months, 63% to 67% have said our nation is on the wrong track.

The middle class saw as much as $4.6 trillion awarded to banks and financial institutions “too big to fail” in the 2008 Wall Street bailout, while the unemployment rate soared to 10 percent in Fall 2009. Next, the Obama Administration’s $800 million stimulus plan in 2009 did very little to stimulate the economy.  The promised “shovel ready” jobs rarely existed.

Younger boomers have suffered through the loss of careers and well-paying positions.  Millions liquidated IRAs just to stay afloat, and are now working at lower-wage jobs and are woefully underprepared for retirement

Military veterans and those in uniform still serving our country feel betrayed, not unlike their Vietnam predecessors. Iraq is far from secure, and there’s a feeling that the sacrifices which nearly 7,000 dead and 52,000 wounded Americans made in Afghanistan and Iraq have little value.

Gen Yers and older Millennials are saddled with nearly $1.4 trillion in college loan debt. Many of these younger adult members of our society are feeling scant hope for their future. They are settling for jobs they had as high school graduates or students. Higher-paying jobs and careers concomitant with the college diploma are rare or non-existent.

Additionally, many voters helped elect Barack Obama president believing that it would help improve racial relations in the country. Just the opposite has happened. A PBS NewsHour/Marist College survey this past fall confirms what many of us suspect: 58 percent of Americans say race relations were worse than just one year prior. Significantly, 76 percent of African Americans stated they and whites do NOT have equal opportunity in getting a job, and 87 percent of African Americans believe they do not have the same opportunity in equal justice.

Voters on both ends of the political spectrum feel betrayed and fooled. More than anything, “I’m mad as hell …” explains the popularity of Bernie Sanders as well. Look at the candidates who’ve dropped from the presidential campaign.  With one exception (Carly Fiorina), all are long-time elected office holders.

So – why are we so surprised when a candidate whose slogan is “Make America Great Again” does this well in the primary campaign?  Trump has already inoculated himself against the Political Media Complex, and the more they attack him, the more his popularity is destined to grow. (If you don’t know what the Political Media Complex is, refer to a column I wrote on in in September by linking here:)

What is really telling is a comparison of turnout in these primary elections so far.  On average, Republican primary elections are drawing an average of 24% MORE voters than they did in 2012. The New York Post attributes this to Trump. I’d rather call it the Howard Beale effect, which Trump has masterfully tapped into so far in the campaign.

LIAR, BUFFOON and FIEND: One or two?

One newspaper account called the candidate a “horrid-looking wretch” who was unfit for office. Other media accounts described him as filthy, a story teller, a despot, a liar, a thief, a braggart and a butcher, as well a liar, buffoon and fiend.

The candidate?  Abraham Lincoln.

Hurling powerful personal attacks against political candidates is nothing new, and it’s been happening since John Adams and Thomas Jefferson opposed each other for the presidency more than 200 years ago.

Those who think Trump winning the Republican nomination for president would destroy the party just don’t understand how the two-party system works in this nation. Sadly, this same system is also advancing a Democratic party candidate whom many voters don’t trust. In January, an ABC News/Washington Post poll revealed that four out of every 10 DEMOCRATS or voters leaning Democrat say they do not trust Hillary Clinton, who will soon be the presumptive Democratic Party nominee. The actual number according to the poll is just 36 percent.

And remember – this is a poll of leaning Democratic voters.

So we are in real danger of the word “liar” becoming one of the most-used words in the 2016 presidential campaign. In light of the realities of raising huge amounts of campaign dollars (something at which Hillary Clinton excels) or spending huge amounts of campaign dollars (something Trump will continue to do), it is a tragic commentary on our two-party system if, in a nation of more than 320 million Americans, the “final two” candidates for President of the United States in 2016 are named Clinton and Trump.

As to the growing negativism on the campaign trail, look no further than Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Every day there are millions of posts from our fellow everyday citizens, saying the most evil and vile things imaginable about various candidates. What’s especially disturbing is the growing number of times when journalists have joined the fray, posting despicable comments about various candidates (most frequently Donald Trump). Every time, within hours the journalist is “forced” to take down the offending post and to apologize. We are rapidly losing civility in our society.

In her terrific 2011 book “The Influencing Machine,” National Public Radio On the Media managing editor Brooke Gladstone simply and eloquently details how the media impacts us.  This is her concluding line: We get the media we deserve.  Sadly, in 2016 it seems that we are getting the candidates we deserve as well.



Max Lucado is an author and pastor at Oak Hills Church in San Antonio, Texas. His blog, reprinted last week in The Washington Post, points out what many in our nation are now saying: A U.S. President should have much better deportment than what Donald Trump is showing on the campaign trail.

Here’s a brief excerpt:

He (Trump) routinely calls people “stupid” and “dummy.” One writer catalogued 64 occasions that he called someone “loser.” These were not off-line, backstage, overheard, not-to-be-repeated comments. They were publicly and intentionally tweeted, recorded and presented.

Lucado is right. He writes that Trump would not pass the “decency interview” he established for his three daughters when guys came calling to date them. He’s not fit to govern, in this pastor’s eyes.

Of course tens of millions of people are disagreeing with Lucado, as expressed in public opinion polls and at the ballot box. Personally, the only solace I’m seeing so far in the 2016 presidential campaign is that I have a still higher calling than that of a U.S. citizen/voter. I belong to a heavenly kingdom, and when I accepted Jesus Christ as my savior it means that his place as Lord is far more important than the occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

Romans 13 calls on believers of Christ to be obedient to government authority. If those “final two” candidates for president in 2016 end up being Trump and Clinton, then God is planning for some pruning of our nation. That’s not a pretty thought, but it is about the only explanation that makes sense.

SOURCES: son-for-record-republican-voter-turnout-trump/

B-E-L-I-E-V-E … and blessed

February 9, 2016

Sometimes life crawls by at what seems like a snail’s pace.  Other times, it flies by faster than the fastest fighter jet. The last few days have been the latter.

On Saturday, I was honored to take 13 students from Revere High School to the Akron District Littles tournament – a qualifier event for the Ohio High School Speech League State Championships.  Only nine of the 13 were real competitors.  The other four are “warm bodies,” or students who agreed to compete to help more students from Revere and other schools in the Akron district qualify for states.

This is a challenging tournament.  On average, only two of every seven competitors advance to States.  Revere’s students practiced and prepared ceaselessly last week.  (So did their coach; my mileage log has me going to the high school seven times, twice a day on two days.) One of my points of emphasis on year was P-P-P-P-P-P, proper practice and preparation promotes perfect performance.

It’s a nice encouragement, but perfection is nearly impossible.  So in notes written to each competitor, which I gave to them as they got on the bus on Saturday morning just before 7 a.m., I encouraged them all to give “practically perfect” performances in speech and debate.

Did they ever!

Revere had four State Qualifiers – junior Anthony Pignataro in Lincoln Douglas debate, sophomore Leah Espinal and Megan Warburton in Public Forum debate, and freshman Melise Williams in Informative speaking.  Another freshman, Victoria Liu, finished just one place away from being an Alternate State Qualifier in informative speaking.  For a growing program that has 20 newcomers and only five returnees with experience, this is phenomenal.

But there’s more.

At the Akron district, our co-chair made repeated request for more Public Forum debate teams, Revere entered a “warm body” duo in this event.  One of them, senior Megan Travers, had health issues and had left actively competing after just one tournament this season.  The other, senior president Drew Espinal, had never competed in a round of public forum debate in his life.  Megan had been in Public Forum more than two years ago.  Megan Warburton and Leah Espinal loaned them cases. We didn’t have high expectations: We were helping out the Akron district, and thought that Megan and Drew might win one or two rounds.  Sure enough, they lost round one of the six-round tournament.

Then, something clicked with these two, and they began to rock.  They won, and won again, and won still again.  In round five, they opposed a 4-0 team, and emerged victorious yet again. They ended up with four victories – good enough to qualify for States as a debate team – before withdrawing after round five due to Megan’s work  schedule.  Drew had previously filed a form to represent Revere in Congressional Debate, so their performance doesn’t “count” for qualifying purposes.   But Drew and Megan’s outstanding debating proved the point I’ve been telling my speakers and debaters, that sign on President Ronald Reagan’s desk – IT CAN BE DONE.


Three of our qualifiers:  L to R: Leah Espinal, Megan Warburton, Anthony Pignataro

One more person from Akron is going to States in Humorous Interpretation and in Informative Speaking thanks to our other “warm bodies.” So, all in all it was a very satisfying tournament for a small but absolutely amazing bunch of good, talented, hard-working students at Revere. They are all winners, but in particular I’ve never seen two sophomores as outstanding in PF Debate as Leah Espinal and Megan Warburton, and never had a freshman who is as coachable as Melise Williams.  I’m blessed to be able to work with this terrific group of students.  Here’s a link to our program’s web site:

So Sunday, I’m resting up and devoting only about four hours to emails and communication to our State-bound speech and debate contingent, which will travel 230 miles to Cincinnati for the OHSSL State Championships on March 4-5.

Then yesterday, I was fortunate to be a combination tour-guide and discussant with five visiting journalists from India.  They are in Cleveland as part of a U.S. State Department program. The Cleveland Council on World Affairs, an outstanding non-profit that promotes education, citizen diplomacy, and public dialogue on international issues, is hosting these journalists.  Here’s a link to this organization:

We began with a stop and an hour-long chat in the Liberal Arts area of Cuyahoga Community College’s Metro campus.  My colleague Professor Neeta Chandra provided an ample supply of refreshments and beverages to our visitors, and we discussed the mission, vision, and challenges of teaching at a community college.  A couple of the journalists quizzed me about the future of journalism in the United States, and we had a fascinating discussion about the future of newspapers, hyper-local news, and other aspects of the profession.

From there, the visiting journalists went to Tri-C’s Advanced Technology Training Center, where we met with Workforce and Economic Development Director Nancy Feighan and her staff.  The journalists got to see several of our manufacturing and trade skills areas, and finished there seeing a couple of high school robotics teams in action.

visiting journalists
Finally, our visitors camped out for a while at the Center for Creative Arts at the Metro campus.  We got a brief look at some production studios, and they concluded by sitting in on a newswriting class which my colleague Tammi Kennedy teaches.  It was a well-done overview of Tri-C, and I’m happy about at how well Neeta, Nancy, and Tammi represented our college.  Special thanks to Katie Ferman, program officer at the Cleveland Council on World Affairs, for reaching out to Tri-C and including us on this itinerary.

Later today I meet with Phil King (the real Dr. Phil, as he helps so many students succeed), principal at Revere High School, as we discuss details about taking eight of our student to Cincinnati for three days.

Zoom  …  I have been operating on over-drive for the last few days, and I’m on sabbatical.

*    *    *    *   *

Imagine a 29-year-old guy who has suddenly hit the wall of failure at a high rate of speed.  He’s been fired from a very prestigious job in the U.S. Senate. He’s doing through a divorce, and he doesn’t even have a place to live.  He doesn’t know if he should continue his future in Alaska, where he moved with his ex-wife three years earlier, or his hometown of Cleveland.  What will happen next?

That’s an easy story for me to complete.  Because the 29-year old was me … 30 years ago, in 1986.

Soon we begin Lent, a 46-day period leading up to Easter during which some Christian faiths call for self-denial, repentance and atonement. Lent has a special meaning for me, because Jesus picked me up on the trash heap of life 30 years ago, dusted me off, and put me on a much better path than I ever could have imaged or deserved.

Simple suggestion for you – if you believe in God, why not spend Lent by devoting 10 to 15 minutes every day to reading God’s word, the Holy Bible? There are thousands of Bible reading plans out there. Here’s a link to the plan I’m following from my church, Cuyahoga Valley Church.

Come back soon for a story about a great athlete who showed the world selflessness, determination and excellence in the face of unbelievable adversity – Jesse Owens.

Thanks for reading.

The Ecstasy and the Agony

October 28, 2015

When it comes to feats of athleticism, a guy pushing 60 shouldn’t try to compete against a guy in his early ‘20s. Even if it is just against himself.

For each of the past two years, I have trained for and successfully completed a half-marathon.  My time in the 2013 Towpath Trilogy half was about 1:56, more than respectable. I didn’t do quite as well in April 2014 on a different course, but — still — at about 2:04, it was a very good showing.

Both times I trained fairly well.  I had the benefit of a terrific partner in Michael Murray in 2013.  Mike’s now gone on to training and running in marathons.

john half cropped

Kerezy running a half marathon in 2013

Both times, I devoted time and put in the necessary miles running prior to the event. Both times, I alternated between “performance” runs and off days in the training regime. Sure I had minor aches and pains in the process, but that comes with chronological age.

Then this year, somehow I got a crazy notion that perhaps I could do as well in a half marathon as I had when I ran my first such race. That was back in 1978.  Jimmy Carter was president. Gas was 65 cents a gallon, and three loaves of bread cost one dollar. We hadn’t heard of Three Mile Island or Iranian hostages yet.  Saturday Night Live’s line-up featured Dan Aykroyd, John Belushi, Chevy Chase, Jane Curtain and Gilda Radner.

One big benefit I had going for me this year was knowledge.  I had picked up a tremendously helpful book, Be a Better Runner, by Sally Edwards, Carl Foster and Roy Wallack. The three authors are perhaps the most knowledgeable people around about every conceivable aspect of running training. In fact, this trio has competed in dozens of marathons, triathlons, and ultra-marathon events. I read the book and followed their recommendations as best I could.

I put in the miles.  My log indicates that I either ran or (on some off days) did elliptical training that totaled 178 miles between August 16 and October 8, my last “good run” day before the October 11 half-marathon.  I exceeded 10 miles twice in the training and had about eight more runs of 7 to 9 miles.

I ate better than I have in many years. Following the advice in the book, more vegetables and fruits found their way into my diet. Monounsaturated fats became a favorite, as did fish. I didn’t get rid of the unhealthy foods as much as I’d liked though.

My lovely wife Kathy warned me not to overdo it. When I confided with her that I was aiming for a time of around 1:50 to 1:55, she tempered my enthusiasm. But she supported me with better food and a lot of prayers and well wishes.

So, at 8 a.m. on October 11, there I was at the starting line at Brandywine Ski Resort.  Bib No. 2136 adorned my shorts.  Ready to rumble!

There is some chess involved in running races nowadays, due to the huge number of competitors.  There were only about 300 runners when I did my first event, a Crawfordsville (IN) Jaycees Half Marathon, in 1978.  There were about 2,000 half marathon competitors on the trail that day – and the Towpath Trail is a lot more narrow than the county roads around Ladoga that I ran on back in the ‘70s.  I chose to not go full speed for the first 1.5 to 2 miles, letting the crowd space out, and then to settle into a good stride after then. My first mile time was 9:30, and I completed the second mile at 18:15. I was feeling better as the race progressed, and I gradually picked up the pace.

I got comfortable as miles 4 and 5 went by, finding a steady running rhythm that matched my training runs. Music helped a lot. There were no Sony Walkman or Apple iPod devices back in 1978! I was also on a “home” course – the same Towpath Trail I had used for longer runs in my training, and nearly the same course I ran in 2013.

When I hit the halfway point in the run, the stopwatch read 57:05.  That was faster than my time at the halfway point in 2013! The hard work and preparation prior to the race seemed to be paying off. Thoughts of a 1:55 or better finish entered in my head.

That stopwatch time bolstered my confidence as the other runners and I passed an orange cone which marked the turnaround. I swung counterclockwise around the marker, feeling strong and sure that I had a good physical and mental state for the finish.

But with minutes of the turnaround, all was lost. Shortly after the turn, I began feeling a steady shooting pain, emanating from my upper right leg and penetrating into my lower back. It was powerful. It was non-stop. It was far worse than anything I had encountered in the nine weeks of running leading up to the half marathon. The pain was even worse than anything I’d ever felt before in running. It was agony.

I slowed down, but the pain persisted.  I stopped and walked. The pain got worse.  I trotted slowly.  The pain lessened (or so it seemed) but it was still there, still searing down my back and upper right leg with each and every step. I stopped and stretched the leg. I poured some water down my leg and back. I tried resuming the race. The pain just got progressively worse.

In my life, I’ve probably run 50-plus road races of varying distances. I’ve raced in Alaska and Indiana. I ran a 5K and a 10K race in Washington DC and Northern Virginia. I’ve run the Revco 10K (that was its name before it became the Cleveland Marathon/Half Marathon etc.) the Bees 5K, and more short- distance races than I can remember.

I never dropped out of a race … until October 11. There was no way I could finish. I left the course near Station Road in Brecksville. I was a little less than five miles from the finish line, but the checkered flag might as well have been on the moon. Only with great help from the race’s support team, employees of the Cuyahoga Valley National Park, was I able to get to the paramedics at the race, and then to my car for the most disappointing ride home in years.

Today, more than two weeks later, I’m still hobbling around. The diagnosis – sciatica, more precisely, inflammation of the sciatic nerve. It is NOT a simple-to-treat condition.

NEXT:  Lessons learned

Throwback Thursday – August 1978

October 22, 2015

(NOTE: This story appeared in the Crawfordsville Journal-Review in August 1978. Coming soon: an explanation about why I’m posting it.)

SOMEWHERE IN SOUTHEASTERN MONTGOMERY COUNTY – I still don’t know how I got conned into this.

It started three weeks ago when I was in Bloomington to see two college classmates run in the Monroe-Morgan 10-mile race. They’d heard about the Crawfordsville Jaycees holding a first-ever marathon and half marathon, and soon I had talked myself into running the 13.1 mile half marathon Sunday if they would, too.

john 1978

The author in ’78

People at Wabash had little faith in my ability to finish the race. Andy Anderson kept asking me if my affairs were in order and if my last will and testament was written. Brenda Amstutz merely questioned my sanity. Both Anderson and Amstutz placed friendly wagers on my run.

They weren’t the only ones either. They merely led the list of unfaithful. Fred Ford, Herman Haffner and Mike Reidy, who all planned to run the half marathon, had their doubts about me finishing the course alive. Even Don Sperry, who is about as nice as they come, had misgivings about my effort.

So I had no choice but to run.  I developed a training schedule and practice as hard as any hopelessly out of shape and overweight man in his early ‘20s should. I missed days, ran too few miles, and found myself more worried about the race as the day approached.

Of course my college friends never made it to the starring line: One took off to Maryland and the other stayed in Fort Wayne. Only the unbelievers were in the race with me to see what would happen.

The first half of the course was manageable. I ran with two late 20-ish men and we moved along in the middle of the 300-plus field.

We reached the 6.5 mile turnaround point on Ladoga Road where a burning ache appeared in my side. Then my legs changed to lead, and every step was like lifting concrete off the road. My breath went from a slow pant to a hoarse, rasping noise that would have scared rabbits from the neighboring farms.

I struggled on to eight miles, the furthest I had ever gone in training, and told my two running mates to leave me behind. In short order, Haffner, Sprerry and about 50 other runners passed my body, now half-walking, half-crawling to the finish line.

My legs went from lead to jelly, melting away with every step. Each breath came with great effort; my heart thumped like a jackhammer, and the hot sun wilted my willpower.  The winding, hilly course seemed to zap my already-waning strength.

It was useless. I walked. I ran – barely. I stopped. I walked some more. I couldn’t go on. “I won’t make it,” I thought. “They’ll have to carry me away.”

Somehow I reached the last aid station.  Just 2.5 miles to go! I drank some lemonade, dumped two glasses of water of my tiring body, and somewhere discovered the stamina to keep going.

Larry Grimes joined me for the last 1.5 miles. I completed the course in 152:20, just behind Haffner.

The feeling at the finish was terrific. I placed 236 out of about 300 runners, but that didn’t bother me. I made it, and Anderson and Amstutz will be providing me with a lunch and some liquid refreshment for my efforts.

I felt even better 15 minutes after my finish, when Mike Reidy came into the chute. I’d even managed to beat out one of my unbelievers!

Now that I’ve got blisters all over my feet and I’m looking for a pair of crutches, I can boast that I did it – and vow to never try it again.  Those guys and girls that can run 13.1 or 26.2 miles can keep their sore feet and aching bones.

When is next year’s marathon, Jaycees?  Sign me up.

What should we do on 9-11?

September 8, 2015
World Trade Center on 9-11. AP Photograph

World Trade Center on
9-11. AP Photograph

Where were you when the world stopped turning? To borrow singer-songwriter Alan Jackson’s line, a whole generation of Americans – millennials – have come of age since that horrific day when evil men reigned terror on this country. There are way too many media stereotypes of the 20-somethings living in mom and dad’s basement, and far too few accounts of the millions who have responded to these terrorist attacks by putting their own lives on the line for their country.

That’s right.  Since 9-11, more than 2.5 million Americans have volunteered to join our nation’s military branches of service. If you think “dumb” or “poor” when you consider those who volunteer, you’re the victim of another stereotype. More than 99 percent of today’s recruits are high school graduates.  About 10 percent of them have 15 or more credits in college before joining.

Service isn’t for everybody, and only a few are qualified. Health issues, a lack of education, and criminal records disqualify many who would like to serve.  “There are 30-some million 17- to 24-year-olds out there, but by the time you get … to those that are qualified, you’re down to less than a million young Americans,” said Maj. Gen. Mark Brilakis, the commander of Marine Corps Recruiting Command, earlier this year.

Pentagon damage photo by Tech Sgt Cedric Rudisill

Pentagon damage photo by Tech Sgt Cedric Rudisill

Military service also means sacrifice. We’ve seen the heart-tugging pictures and videos of reunions of families with a mom or dad absent due to deployments. In the years since 9-11, our armed forces have been fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as involved in peacekeeping or joint military activities in more than 50 different countries across the globe.  There are about 6,000 American who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan since November 2001.

So, what should we do on 9-11 this year?  Three things:

  • THANK A PROTECTOR: More than 400 of those who died on 9-11 were fire fighters, police officers and paramedics, responding to the inferno flames at the two World Trade Center towers.  Our safety forces make great sacrifices to protect us also.  Why not take some time and write a thank you letter – to a police officer, a fire fighter, or to a Marine, Army, Navy, Coast Guard or Air Force member.  Let them know you are appreciative of what they do. Make sure it is postmarked on 9-11 too!
  • VOLUNTEER: Since 9-11, Presidents Obama and Bush and our Congress have called upon Americans to remember that day by performing volunteer service. David Paine of PainePR came up with this idea just a few months after 9-11-01. Each year hundreds of thousands of Americans have committed to service.  Visit these sites:
  • PRAY: Here’s another line from that Alan Jackson song, Did you dust off that old Bible at home? On the screen at the end of the No. 1 movie at the box office in the U.S. this past weekend, “The War Room,” are these words from 2 Chronicles 7:14. “If my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.” God hears the prayers of those who call upon Him.

Our nation needs all this from us as we approach the 14th anniversary of that terrible September day.


September 2, 2015

(NOTE — This also appears in the EYE ON CLEVELAND web site.)

CLEVELAND, September 2, 2015 -– If Donald Trump accepts the Republican Party’s nomination for President here on July 21, 2016, unhappy media executives and political pros will have only one place to look for an explanation – the mirror.

For the past few decades, U.S. governance has come under ever-increasing influence from the Political Media Complex, something which is far more dangerous than the Military Industrial Complex which Dwight Eisenhower warned us about back in 1961.

What is the Political Media Complex?

trump  It is the alliance of media moguls with the interests of political leaders, especially the two major political parties, and the causes and corporations which feed both issues and funds into the election cycles.

One of the first to identify the Complex is the late Don Hewitt, who created CBS’ highly-acclaimed news program “60 Minutes.”  He directed the first Kennedy-Nixon presidential debate in 1960, an event which he described years later, as the night that politicians determined that they were made for each other: TV executives realized political campaigns had unlimited advertising dollars, and politicians realized that TV reached into everybody’s living room.

How big has this influence become?  According to the Federal Elections Commission, there was SEVEN BILLION DOLLARS spent in the 2012 election campaigns.  Big money influences the outcome of many elections, from the battle for the White House on down.

But it’s not just money, it is big issues also.  Many years after the Roe. V. Wade U.S. Supreme Court ruling making abortion legal, the organization Planned Parenthood decided to begin its own political action organization. According to the web site, Planned Parenthood’s Political Action Fund has raised more than $1 million in the 2004, 2012, and 2014 election years.  In the donations listed on the web site, 100% of contributions are to Democratic candidates and/or committees. (More about this later.)

On the “other side” is the National Rifle Association, which has spent $1.6 million or more in lobbying for 13 of the last 17 years, according to the Open Secrets web site. Planned Parenthood and the NRA are just two of thousands of organizations pouring money and influence into the political process.  You name the issue, from A to Z, and chances are hundreds of organization are lining up donors and using dollars to influence your legislators.

All of this plays into the Political Media Complex.

Little wonder that public opinion of government is at unprecedented low levels in recent history. The public distrusts its elected officials, and – what’s worse – no longer trusts the news media to be objective in its reporting either.

One of Donald Trump’s main campaign themes is that the current political system is broken. He’s right, and voters on the stump give him loud applause on that point in his speeches.  Other “nonpolitical” candidates Ben Carson and Carly Fiorina are also picking up steam according to polls in advance of the first real presidential political test, the Iowa Straw Poll in early 2016.

(Aside – One could write thousands of words just on the role that the Political Media Complex is playing in Congress’ upcoming vote on the Iran Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. No matter the vote’s outcome, the treaty will be put into effect. Donald Trump will gain politically when it happens.)

What’s really fascinating about the political process right now is that “Millennials” – young adults in their ‘20s and ‘30s – are increasingly turned off by the status quo of the Political Media Complex and are determined to do things differently, both politically and personally.  One survey shows that 55 percent of millennial adults would like to start their own business one day. They prefer a free-market economy over a government-managed economy by a 64%-to-32% ratio.  So these younger adults, many disaffected, are unlikely to back “traditional” candidates which the Political Media Complex favors, and far more likely to support candidates such as Trump, Carson or Fiorini.


When an “undercover” video at a Mitt Romney campaign event surfaced in September 2012 capturing Romney’s “47 percent” remark, that video and the resulting stories received 88 minutes of airtime on the news broadcasts of the three major networks, ABC, NBC, and CBS, in the month following the video’s release. When former NBA owner Donald Sterling’s racist remarks became public in 2014, the three networks allocated 146 minutes of time to the story in the month following the remarks being made public. That’s more than two hours on the news.


The news stories about Romney and Sterling “fit” the narrative that the Political Media Complex was propagating at the time.

By contrast, the organization Center for Medical Progress has put out (as of this writing) eight “undercover” videos exposing illegal activities of the organization Planned Parenthood — with specificity, breaking the law by selling aborted babies’ body parts. The three major networks have devoted less than 75 SECONDS of airtime to this story in the first 30 days afterward, or just 0.008 percent of their total news minutes.

Why?  News stories about selling aborted baby parts don’t “fit” the Political Media Complex narrative.

Perhaps we’ll further examine the people and forces behind the Political Media Complex in a future blog, but the general public has come to understand that the news is NOT the news anymore.

Way back in 1926, the organization the Society of Professional Journalists developed a four-point code of ethics for the journalism profession. It exists to this day.

The first point – Seek the Truth and Report It.

The second point — Minimize Harm.

To many in the general public, media reporting in 2015 has become the complete antithesis of the journalism profession’s own ethics and standards. The electorate is fed up with the Political Media Complex.

That is why the words “Republican Party Nominee Donald Trump” are becoming more and more possible, with the beginning of the Republican National Convention in Cleveland now less than 300 days away.



Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,774 other followers